View source for German Reich (1933–1945)

{{Infobox country|name=German Reich<br />{{small|(1933–1943)}}<br />{{small|Deutsches Reich|paren=omit}}<hr>Greater German Reich<br />{{small|(1943–1945)}}<br/>{{small|Großdeutsches Reich|paren=omit}}|image_flag=Flag of Germany (1935–1945).svg|image_coat=Reichsadler Deutsches Reich (1935–1945).svg|capital=Berlin|largest_city=Berlin|mode_of_production=[[Imperialism|Imperialist capitalism]]|government_type=Unitary [[Fascism|fascist state]] under a totalitarian [[Nazism|Nazi]] dictatorship|leader_title1=Head of state|leader_name1=Paul von Hindenburg <small>(1933–1934)</small><br>[[Adolf Hitler]] <small>(1934–1945)</small><br>Karl Dönitz <small>(1945)</small>|life_span=1933–1945|image_map=German Reich 1942 (Extended).svg|map_caption=Map of Nazi Germany and its occupied territories.}}
'''Nazi Germany''', officially the '''German Reich''' until 1943 and the '''Greater German Reich''' from 1943 to 1945, also known as the '''Third Reich''', was a [[fascist]] regime led by [[Adolf Hitler]] and the [[National Socialist German Workers' Party|Nazi Party]]. It began on 30 January 1933 when Hitler was appointed as chancellor by president. Paul von Hindenburg, although the old [[Weimar Republic|Weimar]] constitution was used up to the end, with its emergency powers being extensively used. Nazi Germany started [[World War II]] with the invasion of Poland, hoping to seize the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republics|Soviet Union]]. However it lost the war and was pronounced defunct on 7 May 1945 and most of Europe's remaining [[Axis]] personnel surrendered, with a few exceptions.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Hitler’s Holdouts – Meet the Last German Troops to Surrender in WW2|url=https://wp.me/p42Qr6-1II|date=2014-04-30}}</ref> After over four years of Allied occupation, it was succeeded by the [[Federal Republic of Germany]] and the [[German Democratic Republic]] in 1949.

== History ==
On January 4, 1933, bankers and industrialists held a secret backroom deal with then-Chancellor Von Pappen to make Hitler the nation's new Chancellor:
{{quote|The negotiations took place exclusively between Hitler and Papen. […] Papen went on to say that he thought it best to form a government in which the conservative and nationalist elements that had supported him were represented together with the Nazis. He suggested that this new government should, if possible, be led by Hitler and himself together. Then Hitler made a long speech in which he said that, if he were to be elected Chancellor, Papen’s followers could participate in his (Hitler’s) Government as Ministers if they were willing to support his policy which was planning many alterations in the existing state of affairs. He outlined these alterations, including the removal of all Social Democrats, Communists and Jews from leading positions in Germany and the restoration of order in public life. Von Papen and Hitler reached agreement in principle whereby many of the disagreements between them could be removed and cooperation might be possible. It was agreed that further details could be worked out later either in Berlin or some other suitable place.|Kurt Baron von Schröder|<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|editors=Geoffrey Pridham & Jeremy Noakes|title=Nazism, 1919–1945|url=https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=3941|location=Exeter|publisher=University of Exeter Press|volume=I|year=1998|pages=115–16}}</ref>}}
In February 1933, the new Chancellor met with the Reich's leading industrialists at Hermann Göring's home. There were representatives from IG Farben, AG Siemens, BMW, coal mining magnates, Theissen Corp, AG Krupp, as well as a crowd of bankers, investors, and other bourgeois Germans. During this meeting, the Chancellor said that ‘''Private enterprise cannot be maintained in the age of democracy.''’ To reduce regulation, the Chancellery sent its henchmen to every union headquarters on May 2, 1933. They beat the union leaders, sent them to prison or concentration camps, and their party expropriated the union money that the workers paid for their memberships. The unions were now under the leadership of the Chancellery's anti-communists, who helped bargain away all collective bargaining rights.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Germany 1933: from democracy to dictatorship|url=https://www.annefrank.org/en/anne-frank/go-in-depth/germany-1933-democracy-dictatorship|date=2018-09-28}}</ref> One Fascist economist indicated that his party indeed had a thorough plan for deregulation:
{{quote|The first thing [that] German business needs is peace and quiet. It must have a feeling of absolute legal security and must know that work and its return are guaranteed. The interferences in a business which occurred at first, perhaps as a result of too much zeal, have become intolerable.|Gottfried Feder|<ref>{{safesubst:cite news|editor=Briton Hadden|title=NAZIS EASE GRASP ON REICH'S BUSINESS|url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1933/07/04/105151560.html?pageNumber=5|publisher=Time Incorporated|date=1933-07-04|volume=XXII}}</ref>}}
In September 1933, the Chancellery repeatedly cut social provisions, including food rations, to the poor under the guise of combating ‘idolatry’.<ref>{{safesubst:cite news|title=GERMANS TO SKIMP ON A MEAL A MONTH AND FEED JOBLESS|url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1933/09/14/105802896.html|publisher=Time Incorporated|date=1933-09-14}}</ref> In 1934, the Fascists outlined their plan to revitalize the Reich's economy by reprivatization of significant industries: medicine,<ref name="Muehlbauer">{{safesubst:cite web|last=Muehlbauer|first=Peter|title=Obama, Hitler und die Krankenversicherung|url=https://www.heise.de/tp/news/Obama-Hitler-und-die-Krankenversicherung-1992294.html|publisher=Heise Medien|date=2009-08-28|language=German}}</ref> railways, public works,<ref>{{safesubst:cite news|title=REICH WILL PUSH PRIVATE BUSINESS|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1933/09/21/archives/germany-to-push-private-business-economic-council-decides-on-that.html|pageurl=https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/d3fba396-5d8d-4f9e-95c4-089be72fb796_588x868.png|publisher=Time Incorporated|date=1933-09-21}}</ref> construction, steel, and banking. Additionally, the Chancellery guaranteed profits for the private sector, thus many American industrialists and bankers flocked to the Reich to invest.

On January 20, 1934, the Chancellery transferred its right to set minimum wages and working conditions over to the [[Bourgeoisie|businessowners]], stating that the ‘''leader of the enterprise makes the decisions for the employees and laborers in all matters concerning the enterprise, as far as they are regulated by this law.''’<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression|url=https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/1861-ps.asp|location=Washington|publisher=Office of the United States Chief Counsel for Prosecution of Axis Criminality|volume=IV|year=1946}}</ref> Hence, the employers lowered wages, increased hours,<ref>https://bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/ffe67095-0f49-4b78-8a15-982b5782d8f5_562x529.jpeg</ref> eliminated other benefits, and prohibited workers from striking or engaging in other collective bargaining rights. The Nazis eliminated reimbursements for Jewish physicians, which allowed private health insurance companies to profit.<ref name="Muehlbauer" /> The Nazis also rounded up the homeless en-masse and interned them in concentration camps.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Ayaß|first=W.|title=Vagrants and beggars in Hitler's Reich|url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ed34/3d9f11cc03485e7b59489ce6004b40013aa6.pdf|year=1988}}</ref> By the time that the head of the AFL visited the German Reich in 1938, he likened the life of an average German worker to that of a slave.<ref>{{safesubst:cite news|title=GERMAN LABORER LIKENED TO SLAVE|url=https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1938/11/22/98211078.html?pageNumber=5|publisher=Time Incorporated|date=1938-11-22}}</ref>

== Economy ==
{{quote|Irrespective of a quite bad overall performance, an important characteristic of the economy of the Third Reich, and a big difference from a centrally planned one, was the role private ownership of firms was playing—in practice as well as in theory. The ideal Nazi economy would liberate the creativeness of a multitude of private entrepreneurs in a predominantly competitive framework gently directed by the state to achieve the highest welfare of the Germanic people.|Christoph Buchheim and Jonas Scherner|<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last1=Buchheim|first1=Christoph|last2=Scherner|first2=Jonas|title=The Role of Private Property in the Nazi Economy: The Case of Industry|journal=The Journal of Economic History|url=http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capitalisback/CountryData/Germany/Other/Pre1950Series/RefsHistoricalGermanAccounts/BuchheimScherner06.pdf|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=66|number=2|year=2006|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910091952/http://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Workshops-Seminars/Economic-History/buchheim-041020.pdf|archivedate=2015-09-10|page=411|accessdate=2020-01-18}}</ref>}}
The German Reich was the second modern nation after the [[Fascist Italy|Kingdom of Italy]], another fascist state, to implement a [[privatization]] programm.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Bel|first=Germà|title=Against the mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930s Germany|url=http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf|location=Barcelona|publisher=Universitat de Barcelona i ppre-IREA|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720073011/http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf|archivedate=2011-07-20|accessdate=2020-01-29}}</ref> Indeed, the term ‘privatization’ itself was coined to refer to their economic reforms.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=The Nazi Heritage of Privatization|date=11-September-2006|url=https://wp.me/p1kjl-1d}}</ref><ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Bel|first=Germà|title=Retrospectives: The Coining of “Privatization” and Germany’s National Socialist Party|url=https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jep.20.3.187|journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives|volume=20|number=3|year=2006|pages=187–194}}</ref> While consumer spending in the Reich's economy did decrease from 71% in 1929 to 59% in 1938,<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Overy|first=R.J.|title=Guns or Butter? Living Standards, Finance, and Labour in Germany, 1939–1942|url=https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198202905.001.0001/acprof-9780198202905-chapter-10|year=1994|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198202905.003.0010|ISBN=9780198202905}}</ref> income from capital and business also increased from 17.4% of the national income to 26.6%,<ref>{{safesubst:Cite book|last=Shirer|first=William Lawrence|title=The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany|publisher=Simon and Schuster|year=1960|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=6QngAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA264|page=264|ISBN=978-1-4516-5168-3}}</ref> and the rate of return on capital increased in the Fascists’ industry.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Tooze|first=Adam|chapter=4|title=The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-h_Z_KK0MQUC|location=London|publisher=Penguin Books|year=2006|page=152|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=-h_Z_KK0MQUC&pg=PT152|ISBN=978-1-101-56495-0}}</ref>
{{quote|In 1936/37 the capital of the ''Deutsche Bank'', ''Commerzbank'' and ''Dresdner Bank'' in the possession of the German Reich was resold to private shareholders, and consequently the state representatives withdrew from the boards of these banks. Also in 1936 the Reich sold its shares of ''Vereinigte Stahlwerke''. The war did not change anything with regard to this attitude. In 1940 the Genshagen airplane engine plant operated by ''Daimler-Benz'' was privatized; ''Daimler-Benz'' bought the majority of shares held by the Reich earlier than it wished to. But the company was urged by the Reich Aviation Ministry and was afraid that the Reich might offer the deal to another firm. Later in the war the Reich actively tried to privatize as many ''Montan GmbH'' companies as possible, but with little success.|Christoph Buchheim and Jonas Scherner|<ref name=Buchheim406>{{safesubst:cite journal|last1=Buchheim|first1=Christoph|last2=Scherner|first2=Jonas|title=The Role of Private Property in the Nazi Economy: The Case of Industry|journal=The Journal of Economic History|url=http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capitalisback/CountryData/Germany/Other/Pre1950Series/RefsHistoricalGermanAccounts/BuchheimScherner06.pdf|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=66|number=2|year=2006|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910091952/http://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Workshops-Seminars/Economic-History/buchheim-041020.pdf|archivedate=2015-09-10|page=406|accessdate=2020-01-18}}</ref>}}
It was possible for capitalists to fund their projects without relying on any state funds. The development of the first relay computer, for example, was funded entirely through private means,<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Konrad Zuse—the first relay computer|url=https://history-computer.com/ModernComputer/Relays/Zuse.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105231836/https://history-computer.com/ModernComputer/Relays/Zuse.html|archivedate=2020-11-05}}</ref> and while the head of state was unimpressed with the invention they still used it for some minor operations such as calculating aircraft wing design.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Malcolm|first=Chris|title=Who Made the First Computer?|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180923013651/http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/fcomp.shtml|archivedate=2018-09-23}}</ref> Similarly, another business, Günther & Co., designed a board game without any government input. Although the Schutzstaffel harshly criticized its theme, going so far as to call it ‘almost punishable’, it nonetheless never bothered to actually prohibit it.<ref>{{safesubst:tit ref|cite journal|last1=Morris-Friedman|first1=Andrew|last2=Schädler|first2=Ulrich|title=“Juden Raus!” (Jews Out!) – History’s most infamous board game|url=http://www.giochidelloca.it/storia/BGS6.pdf|journal=International Journal for the Study of Board Games|location=Leiden|publisher=Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies|year=2003|volume=6|pages=44–58|pageurl=http://www.giochidelloca.it/storia/BGS6.pdf#page=44|ISSN=1566-1962}}</ref> The German Air Ministry requested prototypes from six companies (Gustloff-Werke, Mauser, Johannes Großfuß Metall- und Lackierwarenfabrik, C.G. Hänel, Rheinmetall-Borsig and Heinrich Krieghoff Waffenfabrik), only two (Krieghoff and Rheinmetall) of whom answered favorably, and an irrelevant offer from Mauser was rejected. All others denied that they could even consider it since they were already working to capacity for the Heereswaffenamt and required its approval for the request.<ref name="Senich">{{cite book|last=Senich|first=Peter|title=The German Assault Rifle: 1935–1945|page=239|publisher=Paladin Press|year=1987}}</ref><ref name="Dugelby">{{cite book|last=Dugelby|first=Thomas B.|title=Death from Above—The German FG42 Paratroop Rifle|page=4|publisher=Collector Grade Publications|year=2007}}</ref>

While the bourgeoisie did implement some regulations, they did this for the sake of their militarily driven economy (much like the [[U.K.]] and the [[U.S.A.]] did during wartime); their purpose was to reinforce private ownership and [[capitalism]]. Henry Spiegel noted three main characteristics of Nazi Germany's economy:<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|author=Henry W. Spiegel|editor=|editors=|title=Wehrwirtschaft: Economics of the Military State|journal=The American Economic Review|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/1805064|location=|publisher=|year=1940|volume=30|number=4|page=717|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref>

# That it was an ‘economy of scarcity’, that is to say, that the exploitation of ‘men and materials was pushed to the limits’.
# That the state used ‘centralized planning under maintenance of some element of the price system’.
# That the state retained the ‘profit motive’ as the primary ‘economic motor’.

There is little evidence to support the interpretation that the German Reich was a ‘[[planned economy]]’.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last1=Frøland|first1=Hans|last2=Ingulstad|first2=Mats|last3=Scherner|first3=Jonas|chapter=1|editors=Hans Otto Frøland, Mats Ingulstad, & Jonas Scherner|title=Industrial Collaboration in Nazi-Occupied Europe: Norway in Context|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fIMgDQAAQBAJ|location=London|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|year=2016|pages=18–9|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=fIMgDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA18|ISBN=978-1-137-53423-1|LCCN=2016942278|DOI=10.1057/978-1-137-53423-1}}</ref> The little ‘central planning’ that the bourgeoisie used was not analogous to the Soviet planning; it was more akin to strategic visions for the economy. The ''Wehrwirtschaft'' ideal held primacy in these plans, which sought to transform the economy into an ‘integrated part of the military machine’, but retaining the system of private ownership.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|author=Martin Wolfe|editor=|editors=|title=The Development of Nazi Monetary Policy|journal=The Journal of Economic History|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/2114432|location=|publisher=|year=1955|volume=15|number=4|page=393|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> For example, rather than allocating production directly according to the System of Material Balances (as the USSR did), the Four Year Plan of 1936 merely instituted price controls, particularly to discourage consumption of goods deemed to be luxuries and to promote the ‘basic industries’ that formed the Fascists’ apparatus of war production.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|author=Martin Wolfe|editor=|editors=|title=The Development of Nazi Monetary Policy|journal=The Journal of Economic History|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/2114432|location=|publisher=|year=1955|volume=15|number=4|page=394|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> Thus food prices effectively increased between the Second Reich and the Third Reich, even despite the ‘higher’ wages and anticommunist attempts at price control, and some foods such as beef, white bread, cereals, and fruits only became more difficult for the proletariat to access (though pork, rye bread, and potatoes did not).<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Winkler|first=Robin|editors=Rui Esteves, Arthur Downing|title=Feast or Famine: The Welfare Impact of Food Price Controls in Nazi Germany|url=https://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/13982/feast-or-famine-rm-winkler-1.pdf|journal=Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History|publisher=University of Oxford|number=136|year=2015}}</ref> In the agricultural realm, the bourgeoisie did not undertake anything resembling Soviet collectivization, but rather instituted price controls through the ''Reichsnährstand'' (‘Reich Food Estate’) to control cost of living.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|author=Martin Wolfe|editor=|editors=|title=The Development of Nazi Monetary Policy|journal=The Journal of Economic History|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/2114432|location=|publisher=|year=1955|volume=15|number=4|page=395|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> The bourgeoisie would institute a new, hereditary law in 1933 that made it much more difficult for anybody to obtain a gentile's<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=1933: KEY DATES|url=https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007499|accessdate=2020-04-25}}</ref> farm, even through trade.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=The Hereditary Farm Law (September 29, 1933)|url=http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1550|accessdate=2020-04-25}}</ref>

Among the Reich's industries, the oil industry was perhaps the best example for how the Fascist bourgeoisie operated the ''Wehrwirtschaft'', as the NSDAP considered it to occupy a ‘special and irreplaceable role’ within the market economy and military machine;<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|author=Raymond G. Stokes|editor=|editors=|title=The Oil Industry in Nazi Germany, 1936–1945|journal=The Business History Review|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/3114932|location=|publisher=|year=1985|volume=59|number=2|page=254|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> thus Fascist capital's inability to steal all of the oil and steel from the U.S.S.R. would further ensure the Reich's collapse.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Tooze|first=Adam|chapter=17|title=The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-h_Z_KK0MQUC|location=London|publisher=Penguin Books|year=2006|pages=686–7|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=-h_Z_KK0MQUC&pg=PT686|ISBN=978-1-101-56495-0}}</ref> In the 1930s, Porsche quickly designed the Volkswagen Beetle because one anticommunist claimed to want a cheap and sturdy vehicle that almost everybody in the Reich would be able to drive. He lobbied for his approval, and Porsche's slaves soon began producing these vehicles by the thousands, to the point where they ran low on dealerships, but the project turned out to be a scam:
{{quote|Since private industry could not turn out an automobile for $396, Hitler ordered the State to build it and placed the Labor Front in charge of the project. Dr. Ley’s organization promptly set out in 1938 to build at Fallersleben, near Braunschweig, “the biggest automobile factory in the world,” with a capacity for turning out a million and a half cars a year “more than Ford,” the Nazi propagandists said. The Labor Front advanced fifty million marks in capital. But that was not the main financing. Dr. Ley’s ingenious plan was that the workers themselves should furnish the capital by means of what became known as a “pay-before-you-get-it” installment plan five marks a week, or if a worker thought he could afford it, ten or fifteen marks a week. When 750 marks had been paid in, the buyer received an order number entitling him to a car as soon as it could be turned out. Alas for the worker, not a single car was ever turned out for any customer during the Third Reich. Tens of millions of marks were paid in by the German wage earners, not a pfennig of which was ever to be refunded. By the time the war started the Volkswagen factory turned to the manufacture of goods more useful to the Army.|William Shirer|<ref name=pg267>{{safesubst:Cite book|last=Shirer|first=William Lawrence|chapter=8|title=The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6QngAAAAQBAJ|publisher=Simon and Schuster|year=1960|page=267|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=6QngAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA267|ISBN=978-1-4516-5168-3}}</ref>}}
Siemens in particular was probably the most important and prolific business in Nazi Germany, and consequently lost most of its factories during WWII. The business was responsible for the rail infrastructure, communications, power generation, factories (including in Auschwitz and Buchenwald), firearms, execution chambers and more throughout the Reich, and survivors later demanded reparations from this business.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Levy|first=Stephanie|title=Holocaust litigation: asking the courts to right a historic wrong.|url=http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Holocaust+litigation:+asking+the+courts+to+right+a+historic+wrong-a063795747|date=2000-07-01}}</ref><ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Siemens retreats over Nazi name|url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2233890.stm|date=2002-09-05}}</ref> Other businesses such as the Holtzbrinck Publishing Group and Bertelsmann distributed a wide range of propaganda to the Wehrmacht and other anticommunists in the forms of books and magazines. Although somebody did jail a few senior Bertelsmann employees for alleged black-market paper trading in 1944, the Reich Minister of Propaganda pardoned them anyway.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Manus|first=Elizabeth|title=Bertelsmann’s Nazi Past Gets Ho-Hummed in U.S.|url=https://observer.com/?p=18503|date=1999-01-18|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110724074250/http://www.observer.com/1999/01/bertelsmanns-nazi-past-gets-hohummed-in-us|archivedate=2011-07-24}}</ref>

Under the banner of ‘rearmament and autarky’, the Fascist bourgeoisie began to use its Four Year Plans to encourage sectors like construction, oil, chemicals, and engineering over others, such as coal and agriculture.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|author=Raymond G. Stokes|editor=|editors=|title=The Oil Industry in Nazi Germany, 1936–1945|journal=The Business History Review|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/3114932|location=|publisher=|year=1985|volume=59|number=2|pages=258–260|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> Under the Plans, the bourgeois state took control over marketing, but corporate leaders remained in charge of the industry as a whole, indicating that the NSDAP was uninterested in either nationalization or direct government management.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|author=Raymond G. Stokes|editor=|editors=|title=The Oil Industry in Nazi Germany, 1936–1945|journal=The Business History Review|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/3114932|location=|publisher=|year=1985|volume=59|number=2|page=254|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref>
{{quote|Available sources make perfectly clear that the Nazi regime did not want at all a German economy with public ownership of many or all enterprises. Therefore it generally had no intention whatsoever of nationalizing private firms or creating state firms. On the contrary the reprivatization of enterprises was furthered wherever possible.|Christoph Buchheim and Jonas Scherner|<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last1=Buchheim|first1=Christoph|last2=Scherner|first2=Jonas|title=The Role of Private Property in the Nazi Economy: The Case of Industry|journal=The Journal of Economic History|url=http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capitalisback/CountryData/Germany/Other/Pre1950Series/RefsHistoricalGermanAccounts/BuchheimScherner06.pdf|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=66|number=2|year=2006|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910091952/http://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Workshops-Seminars/Economic-History/buchheim-041020.pdf|archivedate=2015-09-10|pages=405–406|accessdate=2020-01-18}}</ref>}}
On the rare occasions when they were forced to make use of state-owned factories, they included a contract option allowing private owners to purchase it. In addition, they avoided the creation of state-owned enterprises whenever possible, favoring private investment:
{{quote|State-owned plants were to be avoided wherever possible. Nevertheless, sometimes they were necessary when private industry was not prepared to realize a war-related investment on its own. In these cases, the Reich often insisted on the inclusion in the contract of an option clause according to which the private firm operating the plant was entitled to purchase it. Even the establishment of ''Reichswerke Hermann Goring'' in 1937 is no contradiction to the rule that the Reich principally did not want public ownership of enterprises. The Reich in fact tried hard to win the German industry over to engage in the project.|Christoph Buchheim and Jonas Scherner|<ref name=Buchheim406/>}}
In 1938 for example, the Reich forced the Jewish businessman Julius Fromm to vend his condom business to Baroness Elisabeth von Epenstein at 116,000ℛℳ, a fraction of its real value. In return for this, she gave Hermann Göring two castles.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last1=Aly|first1=Gotz|last2=Sontheimer|first2=Michael|transl=Shelley Frisch|title=Fromms: How Julius Fromm's Condom Empire Fell to the Nazis|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7ZYrAQAAQBAJ|date=2009-10-13|publisher=Other Press, LLC|page=98|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=7ZYrAQAAQBAJ&pg=PT94|ISBN=9781590513774}}</ref>

In terms of workers' rights, the NSDAP immediately began to crack down on political enemies (socialists and social democrats): first, ensuring that these groups were destroyed by force, and second, granting ‘extraordinary powers’ to employers to minimize the ability of workers to organize.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|last=Mason|first=Tim|editor=|editors=|title=The Workers’ Opposition in Nazi Germany|journal=History Workshop|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/4288349|location=|publisher=|year=1981|volume=11|number=|page=121|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> The Nazis established the German Labour Front (Deutsche Arbeitsfront, DAF) by destroying non-DAF trade unions and seizing their funds.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Persecution of Trade Unionists|url=https://neu.org.uk/media/3056/view|year=2012}}</ref> Propaganda suggested that the DAF was intended to mediate conflicts between businessowners and workers. In practice, the anticommunists used the DAF to decrease workers’ power and to trap them in their current place of employment.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite book|last=Shirer|first=William Lawrence|chapter=8|title=The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany|publisher=Simon and Schuster|year=1960|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=6QngAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA263|page=263|ISBN=978-1-4516-5168-3}}</ref> After the so-called German Labor Front absorbed the unions, wages fell for front-line workers, working hours increased by 15%, industrial accidents became more common, and capitalists could blacklist workers for complaining about the working conditions.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Life in Nazi Germany 1933-1939|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zpq9p39/revision/1|accessdate=2020-04-26}}</ref> The Nazis introduced the large ‘Strength Through Joy’ (Kraft Durch Freude) vacation program to sell the working class on Fascism and to boost the Reich's tourism, but contrary to what the propaganda suggested, it was heavily involved in regimenting the leisure time of workers towards Fascist goals rather than allowing the proletariat more freedoms:
{{quote|Tied down by so many controls at wages little above the subsistence level, the German workers, like the Roman proletariat, were provided with circuses by their rulers to divert attention from their miserable state. “We had to divert the attention of the masses from material to moral values,” Dr. Ley once explained. “It is more important to feed the souls of men than their stomachs.”<br/><br/>
So he came up with an organization called Kraft durch Freude (“Strength through Joy”). This provided what can only be called regimented leisure. […] [I]t [was] deemed necessary to control not only the working hours but the leisure hours of the individual. This was what “Strength through Joy” did. In pre-Nazi days Germany had tens of thousands of clubs devoted to everything from chess and soccer to bird watching. Under the Nazis no organized social, sport or recreational group was allowed to function except under the control and direction of Kraft durch Freude.|William Shirer|<ref>{{safesubst:Cite book| last = Shirer| first = William Lawrence| title = The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany|publisher=Simon and Schuster|year=1960|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=6QngAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA265|page=265|ISBN=978-1-4516-5168-3}}</ref>}}
Whereas the [[Weimar Republic]] created collective wage agreements across industries in hopes of preventing intense competition for labor, Nazi Germany's official wage rates were far lower than Weimar wage rates, could be overruled (allowing lower pay) for individual companies by the DAF's ‘labor trustees’, and disallowed the possibility of collective bargaining by the workers.<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Siegel|first=Tilla|title=Wage Policy in Nazi Germany|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/003232928501400101|journal=Politics & Society|location=|publisher=|date=1985-03-01|volume=14|issue=1|pages=1–51|DOI=10.1177/003232928501400101}}</ref> Unemployment was approximately 34% in early 1933, and official statistics reduced this rate to 0.9% for 1939.<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last1=Galenson|first1=Walter|last2=Zellner|first2=Arnold|editor=Universities-National Bureau|title=International Comparison of Unemployment Rates|url=https://www.nber.org/chapters/c2649.pdf|journal=The Measurement and Behavior of Unemployment|publisher=NBER|year=1957|pages=455–474, 526–537|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919113314/https://www.nber.org/chapters/c2649.pdf|archivedate=2015-09-19|ISBN=0-691-04144-X}}</ref> This was likely in part because the official statistics did not take conscriptions, enemies of the bourgeois state, or women into account.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Life in Nazi Germany 1933-1939|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zqrfj6f/revision/3|accessdate=2020-04-25}}</ref> [[Slavery]] would expand and contribute to the Reich's economy recovery.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Silverman|first=Dan|title=Hitler’s Economy: Nazi Work Creation Programs, 1933–1936|url=https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674740716|date=1998-08-31|ISBN=9780674740716}}</ref>

Abroad, the NSDAP engaged in what came to be termed ‘fascist imperialism’ by historian Maurice Dobb.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|last=Dobb|first=Maurice|editor=|editors=|title=Aspects of Nazi Economic Policy|journal=Science & Society|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/40399575|location=|publisher=|year=1944|volume=8|number=2|page=97|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> Dobb pointed out that, while earlier imperialist ventures targeted unindustrialized and undeveloped nations, Fascist imperialism annexed countries that had “already reached a high level of industrial development” and incorporated them as colonies of the Reich.<ref name="Dobb">{{safesubst:Cite journal|last=Dobb|first=Maurice|editor=|editors=|title=Aspects of Nazi Economic Policy|journal=Science & Society|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/40399575|location=|publisher=|year=1944|volume=8|number=2|page=98|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref> For example, as the Reich's debt accumulated dramatically,<ref>{{safesubst:cite news|title=Economic Controls in Nazi Germany|url=https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1940110100#H2_4|date=1940-11-01|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910204241/http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1940110100#H2_4|archivedate=2015-09-10}}</ref> and the annexation of Austria did little to improve the economy,<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Abt|first=Parker|title=The Nazi Fiscal Cliff: Unsustainable Financial Practices before World War II|url=https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1188&context=ghj|journal=The Gettysburg Historical Journal|volume=16|article=5|year=2017}}</ref> the German anticommunists would invade Western Poland in 1939 and devastate many of the industries there. Once the bourgeois state successfully subordinated a country, it embarked upon the “unprecedented” task of “de-industrializing” it so that it could produce food and raw materials for the Fascist economy, while maintaining a “monopoly of industrial production” in the German heartland itself.<ref name="Dobb" /> When de-industrialization was complete, the bourgeois state granted Fascist firms “extensive privileges” to develop raw material production in the occupied territories, and established “obligatory delivery quotas” of such materials to the Fascists.<ref>{{safesubst:Cite journal|last=Dobb|first=Maurice|editor=|editors=|title=Aspects of Nazi Economic Policy|journal=Science & Society|url=https://www.jstor.org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/stable/40399575|location=|publisher=|year=1944|volume=8|number=2|page=99|pageurl=|isbn=|oclc=}}</ref>

Many Nordic capitalists proved quite useful to the Reich. As early as 1940, 54% of Finnish exports went to the Reich.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|title=Yearbook of Finnish Foreign Policy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P9bwAAAAMAAJ|publisher=Finnish Institute of International Affairs|year=1976|page=9|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=P9bwAAAAMAAJ&q="exports+went"}}</ref> Despite the anti-German sentiment in Finland that the Reich's policy during the [[Winter War]] generated, the Fascists knew that Finnish demands were much easier to meet than those of the Soviets, and the Finnish bourgeoisie willingly vended 60% of Petsamo's nickel to the Reich during 1940, much to the Soviets’ displeasure. By August 1940 the Reich was quietly supplying the Finnish state with arms through private commercial channels, and the Finnish and German bourgeoisies signed a significant arms delivery by October 1940 and a supplementary troop transit by November 1940, further worrying the Soviets.<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Krosby|first=H.|title=The Diplomacy of the Petsamo Question and Finnish-German Relations, March–December 1940|journal=Scandia|url=https://journals.lub.lu.se/scandia/article/download/774/560|volume=31|number=2|year=1965}}</ref>

== Infrastructure ==

=== Health ===
Nazi Germany experienced significant mortality and nutritional crises during peacetime (a remarkably rare occurrence in a developed nation):
{{quote|Germany experienced a substantial increase in mortality rates in most age groups in the mid-1930s, even relative to those of 1932, the worst year of the Great Depression. Moreover, children’s heights—an indicator of the quality of nutrition and health—were generally stagnating between 1933 and 1938, but had increased significantly during the 1920s. Persecution, by itself, does not explain such an adverse development in biological welfare; the non-persecuted segments of the German population were affected as well.|Andrea Wagner & Jörg Baten|<ref name=Autarchy>{{safesubst:Cite book |last1=Baten |first1=Jörg |last2=Wagner |first2=Andrea |editor=|editors= |title=Autarchy, market disintegration, and health: the mortality and nutritional crisis in Nazi Germany, 1933–1937 |journal=Economics & Human Biology |url=https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X02000023 |archiveurl=https://wp.me/pa7b25-1i |archivedate=30/July/2018 |location=Germany |publisher=Elsevier Science B.V. |year=2003 |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=1–28 |pageurl= |doi=10.1016|oclc=}}</ref>}}
These problems were the direct result of their capitalist policy:
{{quote|The reason for this adverse development was caused by the fact that military expenditures increased at the expense of public health measures. In addition, food imports were curtailed, and prices of many agricultural products were controlled. There is ample evidence that this set of economic policies had an adverse effect on the health and nutritional status of the population.|Andrea Wagner & Jörg Baten|<ref name=Autarchy/>}}
By 1939, living standards were even lower than those of other anticommunist regimes, such as the [[U.K.]] and the [[U.S.]]

== Ideology ==
{{fascism}}<blockquote>{{quote|It is […] entirely appropriate to register the point that, despite the [[Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact|Nazi–Soviet pact]], and indeed other instances of his opportunistic use of anti-Bolshevism to achieve short-term goals, Hitler remained committed from the early 1920s until his downfall in 1945 to the pursuit and destruction of Bolshevism. Even if he may have toyed fleetingly with the idea of accommodating the Soviet Union as a partner in Ribbentrop’s proposed ''Kontinentalblock'' in the hope of finally ending his war with Britain, […] the fact remains that the struggle against Bolshevism constituted a fixed principle, the ‘lodestar’, as Ian Kershaw has put it, of his foreign policy. Indeed, given the intensity of Hitler’s views on the Jewish question, it could hardly have been otherwise from the moment in the early 1920s when he accepted that Bolshevism was an invention and instrument of the Jews, who wished to use it to impose their own tyranny across the globe.|Lorna L. Waddington|<ref name=Waddington>{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Waddington|first=Lorna|title=The Anti-Komintern and Nazi Anti-Bolshevik Propaganda in the 1930s|journal=Journal of Contemporary History|location=London|publisher=SAGE Publications|volume=42|issue=4|year=2007|pages=573–594|ISSN=0022–0094|DOI=10.1177/0022009407081488}}</ref>}}</blockquote>

=== Eugenics ===
The Reich's eugenics programme was consciously inspired by eugenics programmes in the [[United States of America|United States]]<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Kaelber|first=Lutz|title=Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States|url=http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200303104237/http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics|archivedate=2020-03-03}}</ref> from the 1920s and earlier. The Führer himself once wrote Madison Grant an appreciative letter implying that ''The Passing of the Great Race'' was one of his favorite books, and Fascists regularly communicated with eugenicists from New York to California, who were eager to assist with the Reich’s programme.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Black|first=Edwin|title=Hitler's debt to America|url=https://amp.theguardian.com/uk/2004/feb/06/race.usa|date=2004-02-05|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315091802/https://amp.theguardian.com/uk/2004/feb/06/race.usa|archivedate=2016-03-15}}</ref> Physically and mentally challenged people thus became early victims of the Third Reich’s violence. Nevertheless, the Fascists made some exceptions for capitalists deemed too useful for disposal, such Artur Adolf Konradi, who was paralysed from the waist below, and Max Hahn, who lost one of his arms in [[WWI]]. Some physicians have also speculated that the Chancellor himself was suffering from Parkinson’s disease at the time of his death.

Generally, Nazi Germany held people of color in contempt, with some government officials holding a less intolerant attitude towards certain Asian men, although the Reich nevertheless opportunistically accepted the assistance of many volunteers of color such as the Free Arabian Legion, and despite their own aggressive colonialism, the Fascists frequently exploited the anticolonial sentiments of Arabs<ref name="Hammond">{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Hammond|first=Kelly|title=Managing Muslims: imperial Japan, Islamic policy, and Axis connections during the Second World War*|journal=Journal of Global History|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=12|year=2017|pages=251–273|doi=10.1017/S1740022817000079}}</ref> and Indians,<ref name="Bauerkämper">{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Bauerkämper|first=Arnd|title=Transnational Fascism: Cross-Border Relations between Regimes and Movements in Europe, 1922–1939*|journal=East Central Europe|volume=37|location=Leiden|publisher=Koninklijke Brill|year=2010|pages=214–246|DOI=10.1163/187633010X534469}}</ref> probably as a means of pitting their enemies against each other. After the conclusion of the Anti-Comintern Pact of 1936, the Fascists’ white supremacy made an exception for Japanese people, and relaxed attitudes further after the Tripartite Pact of 1940, but some complications remained even after these pacts. For example, intermarriages between Germans and Japanese, while technically legal, remained discouraged, and the few interracial couples in the Reich faced harassment. There were also some European Fascist politicians who never completely trusted the [[Empire of Japan]] either, a feeling which the Imperialists held toward them in turn.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Krebs|first=Gerhard|editors=Rotem Kowner, Walter Demel|chapter=10|chapterurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=6Tq2CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA217|title=Racism under negotiation: the Japanese race in the Nazi-German perspective|series=Brill’s Series on Modern East Asia in a Global Historical Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6Tq2CAAAQBAJ|location=Boston & Leiden|publisher=Brill|year=2015|volume=II|pages=217–241|DOI=10.1163/9789004292932_011|ISBN=978-90-04-29293-2|ISSN=2212-1730}}</ref> Despite the wavering attitudes and the want of consensus, Japanese men were the people of color for whom the Fascists had the most tolerance. There were likely about five hundred Japanese people living in Berlin during the early 1940s, a number comparable to that of the Germans living in the Empire of Japan, and many Japanese in the Reich worked as diplomats, military officers, students, and trading company employees.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Kudō|first=Akira|editor=J.A.A. Stockwin|chapter=1|title=Japanese-German Business Relations: Co-operation and Rivalry in the Interwar Period|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W00qBgAAQBAJ|location=London|publisher=Routledge|year=1998|year_published=2001|page=31|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=W00qBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA31|ISBN=0-203-01851-6}}</ref>

=== Anti-Semitism ===
{{Main|Anti-semitism in Nazi Germany}}
One crucial part of German Fascism was antisemitism; only a tiny minority of German Fascists (e.g. Karl Plagge, Oskar Schindler) secretly dissented from this view. Traditionally, antisemitism in German society referenced Jewish culture as its basis, but capitalists such as Henry Ford<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|title=Mein Kampf : Nazi Germany|url=http://spartacus-educational.com/GERmein.htm|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140515020345/http://spartacus-educational.com/GERmein.htm|archivedate=2014-05-15}}</ref><ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Ryback|first=Timothy|chapter=three|title=Hitler’s Private Library|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VZY6CB_9IGAC|date=2008-10-21|location=|publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group|page=69|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=VZY6CB_9IGAC&pg=PA69|ISBN=978-1-4000-4204-3}}</ref><ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Dobbs|first=Michael|title=Ford and GM Scrutinized for Alleged Nazi Collaboration|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm|date=1998-11-30|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090605012002/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/nov98/nazicars30.htm|archivedate=2009-06-05}}</ref><ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Sartore|first=Melissa|title=How Henry Ford Helped The Nazis As Much As He Possibly Could|url=https://www.ranker.com/list/relationship-between-henry-ford-and-nazis/melissa-sartore|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170831125043/http://www.ranker.com/list/relationship-between-henry-ford-and-nazis/melissa-sartore|archivedate=2017-08-31}}</ref> introduced a more ‘racial’ justification for this phenomenon, claiming that Jews were innately rather than just socially or religiously inferior.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last1=Pool|first1=James|last2=Pool|first2=Suzanne|chapter=3|title=Who Financed Hitler|location=U.S.A.|year=1997|url=https://archive.org/stream/WhoFinancedHitler|page=91|pageurl=https://archive.org/stream/WhoFinancedHitler#page/n47/mode/1up|ISBN=0-8037-8941-6}}</ref> In reality, however, the Fascists were committing antisemitism as a means of preserving most of the petite-bourgeoisie: concentrating capitalism's horrible economic pressure on only a minor segment of the class rather than its entirety.<ref>{{safesubst:cite journal|title=Bordiga’s “Auschwitz, or the Great Alibi”|journal=Programme Communiste|url=https://www.Marxists.org/subject/jewish/bordiga/auschwitz.htm#a3|number=11|trans=Mitchell Abidor}}</ref>

As well, Fascist antisemitism sometimes spread to regions where it had previously been uncommon or nonexistent. For the 1920s and most of the 1930s, Italian Fascists tolerated Jews, and sometimes even complained that German Fascism was too antisemitic, but by 1938 the Kingdom of Italy officially adopted antisemitism due to the overwhelming popularity of the German Reich.<ref name="Bauerkämper" /> Antisemitism had been nonexistent in East Asia due to the sheer rarity of Jews there, but as a consequence of the German Reich's popularity in the Empire of Japan during the 1930s, a minority of Imperialists adopted the antisemitism of their European partners, and in the 1940s the Imperialists implemented some antisemitic policies as part of the inter-Axis Indian Ocean cooperation. At the request of the Western Axis, the Imperialists arrested and incarcerated hundreds of Jews throughout Southeast Asia, and Imperial propagandists would sometimes campaign against ‘Jewish world control’ during 1943 in an attempt to distract local Muslims. Imperial authorities also forcibly relocated 20,000 Shanghai Jews into a ghetto, though they did ignore several thousand other Jews there, mainly ones of either Middle Eastern or Soviet origin.<ref name="Kowner2017">{{safesubst:cite journal|en|last=Kowner|first=Rotem|title=When economics, strategy, and racial ideology meet: inter-Axis connections in the wartime Indian Ocean*|journal=Journal of Global History|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=12|issue=2|date=2017-06-08|pages=228–250|doi=10.1017/S1740022817000067}}</ref> The majority of the Empire of Japan still found antisemitism incomprehensible, however, and applied actions such as these only sporadically. Fascist antisemitism also contaminated the Arab world, made the anti-Jewish sentiment there much more aggressive, and influenced Arab ultranationalist discourse, even decades after 1945.<ref name="Hammond" />

=== Military Ideology ===
The Nazi state's ideology also manifested itself in its military policies.

== Culture ==
The Fascists coined the locution ‘[[cultural Bolshevism]]’ to disparage cultural phenomena that they deemed worthy of purging, such as jazz. The Fascist state subjected abstractionist artwork to ridicule and favored genres that were less unrealistic. In 1941, the bourgeois state prohibited Fraktur under the official excuse that it consisted of ‘Jewish characters’.<ref>{{safesubst:cite book|last=Reuveni|first=Gideon|chapter=IV|title=Reading Germany: Literature and Consumer Culture in Germany before 1933|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4KNdCjZ4OZgC|location=New York|publisher=Berghahn Books|year=2006|page=206|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=4KNdCjZ4OZgC&pg=PA206|trans=Ruth Morris|ISBN=1-84545-087-6}}</ref> The Fascists also paid special attention to children, marketing to them explicitly anti-Semitic books such as ''Trust No Fox on his Green Heath and No Jew on his Oath'', and also marketed playthings that glorified the military, such as tanks and Fascist figurines, but ceased production of certain ones if they were based on somebody that the bourgeois state just executed. They once marketed an expensive bridge playset, but it sold poorly in part because it was not a militarily specific piece.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Leatherdale|first=Duncan|title=Nazi toys expected to raise thousands at Thornaby auction|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tees-31991001|date=2015-03-25|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150327191128/http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tees-31991001|archivedate=2015-03-27}}</ref>

=== Religion ===
The Fascists invented a culturally specific variant of Christianity called Positive Christianity, which sought to unify the local Catholic and Protestant churches. It taught that Jesus Christ was an Aryan rather than a Jew, and was himself fighting against the Jews.<ref>{{safesubst:cite web|last=Springer|first=Karl|title=Onward! Humor from the Period of Struggle of the National Socialist Movement|url=https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/springer.htm|location=Munich|publisher=Zentralverlag der NSDAP|year=1939|trans=Randall Bytwerk}}</ref> This variant had little in common with mainstream Christianity, received the condemnation of Christian authorities elsewhere in the world, and was abandoned by the end of the Reich.

=== Gun Control ===
The Weimar Republic passed very stringent gun laws that essentially banned all gun ownership in an attempt to stabilize the country and comply with the Treaty of Versailles, with a law in 1928 undoing some of this by creating a permit system. Most men and many women still owned weapons from during or before the first World War though and this new law was applied quite rarely, mostly when newly bought weapons became registered. The Nazis used these records to confiscate guns from their enemies, but because they only covered a few of the weapons in circulation, many Jewish people and others managed to stash away weapons into the late 1930s. In 1938 the Nazis adopted the German Weapons Act, which reduced gun restrictions to just handguns, extended permits from one year to three, and lowered the legal age of purchase from 20 years to 18. Many categories of people were further no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions, such as holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and Nazi Party members. On 11 November of that same year though, the Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons was issued, banning all Jews in the Reich from owning any kind of weapon. Jewish homes were already being raided by the Nazis however, and as the Anti-Defamation League [https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/adl-says-nazi-analogies-have-no-place-in-gun-control-debate explained in 2013], the small amount of Jews could in no way have stopped the power of the Nazi state.

In current gun control discussions a reference to the disarmament of the Nazis' victims is often made as an argument for loose firearm regulations, in spite of the facts of the actual situation, with the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto Uprising also being brought up. As for that case, 7,000 Jews died and 50,000 were sent to concentration camps whereas German losses as estimated to be from under 20 to several hundred — at any rate an overwhelming defeat for the armed civilians, who lacked tremendous amounts of almost every aspect that actually took the Allies to defeat the Third Reich.<ref>[https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/apr/08/viral-image/no-gun-control-regulation-nazi-germany-did-not-hel/ No, gun control regulation in Nazi Germany did not help advance the Holocaust]. ''PolitiFact''.</ref>

== See also ==
* [[Nazism]]
* [[National Socialist Germany Workers' Party]] 
* [[The Holocaust]] 
* [[Fascist Italy]] 

== References ==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Nazi Germany]]
[[Category:Nazism]]
[[Category:Fascist states]]
[[Category:Second World War]]