Left communism: Difference between revisions

From Revolupedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<blockquote><small>"Lenin referred to the "Left Communists" as Lefts sometimes with and sometimes without quotation marks. But everyone realizes that Lenin called them Lefts ironically, thereby emphasizing that they were Lefts only in words, in appearance, but that in reality they represented petty-bourgeois Right trends. [...] There you have a picture of the specific platform and the specific methods of the "Lefts." This, in fact, explains why the "Lefts" sometimes succeed in luring a part of the workers over to their side with the help of high-sounding "Left" phrases and by posing as the most determined opponents of the Rights, although all the world knows that they, the "Lefts," have the same social roots as the Rights, and that they not infrequently join in an agreement, a bloc, with the Rights in order to fight the Leninist line.  [...]  But if the Trotskyist trend represents a "Left" deviation, does not this mean that the "Lefts" are more to the Left than Leninism? No, it does not. Leninism is the most Left (without quotation marks) trend in the world labor movement. We Leninists belonged to the Second International down to the outbreak of the imperialist war as the extreme Left group of the Social-Democrats. We did not remain in the Second International and we advocated a split in the Second International precisely because, being the extreme Left group, we did not want to be in the same party as the petty-bourgeois traitors to Marxism, the social-pacifists and social-chauvinists." —[[Joseph Stalin]], ''Industrialization of the country and the Right Deviation in the C.P.S.U.(B.)''</small></blockquote>
[[File:Anton Pannekoek.jpg|thumb|337x337px|Photo of [[Anton Pannekoek]], a major "left" communist thinker. ]]
[[File:Anton Pannekoek.jpg|thumb|337x337px|Photo of [[Anton Pannekoek]], a major "left" communist thinker. ]]
'''"Left-wing" communism''', or simply '''"left" communism''', refers to a number of [[opportunist]], [[dogmatic]], and [[Revisionism|revisionist]] political tendencies which advocate extremist, uncompromising stances on topics such as [[vanguardism]], the [[Dictatorship of the Proletariat|proletarian dictatorship]], and [[Parliament|parliamentary]] participation.<ref>Paul Mattick (1938). [https://www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1938/mass-vanguard.htm ''The Masses & The Vanguard'']. Available on the Marxists Internet Archive.<br><small>''"The principles of independent struggle, solidarity and communism are being forced upon them in the actual class struggle. With this powerful trend toward mass consolidation and mass action the theory of regrouping and realigning the militant organizations seems to be outdated. True regroupment is essential, but it cannot be a mere merger of the existing organizations. In the new conditions a revision of fighting forms is necessary. “First clarity – then unity.” Even small groups recognizing and urging the principles of independent mass movement are far more significant than large groups that deprecate the power of the masses."''</small></ref> "Left" communists opposed [[Leninism]] and the [[October Revolution]].{{Efn|Certain "left" communist figures have claimed to adhere to Leninism such as [[Amadeo Bordiga]] and his supporters, although they largely omit Leninist theory and opposed its implementation in the [[Soviet Union]] under [[Joseph Stalin]].}} Because of their positions and actions, "left" communists are only [[leftist]] in words yet effectively [[rightist]] in their deeds, serving a [[Counter-revolution|counter-revolutionary]] function.  
'''"Left-wing" communism''', or simply '''"left" communism''', refers to a number of [[opportunist]], [[dogmatic]], and [[Revisionism|revisionist]] political tendencies which advocate extremist, uncompromising stances on topics such as [[vanguardism]], the [[Dictatorship of the Proletariat|proletarian dictatorship]], and [[Parliament|parliamentary]] participation.<ref>Paul Mattick (1938). [https://www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1938/mass-vanguard.htm ''The Masses & The Vanguard'']. Available on the Marxists Internet Archive.<br><small>''"The principles of independent struggle, solidarity and communism are being forced upon them in the actual class struggle. With this powerful trend toward mass consolidation and mass action the theory of regrouping and realigning the militant organizations seems to be outdated. True regroupment is essential, but it cannot be a mere merger of the existing organizations. In the new conditions a revision of fighting forms is necessary. “First clarity – then unity.” Even small groups recognizing and urging the principles of independent mass movement are far more significant than large groups that deprecate the power of the masses."''</small></ref> "Left" communists opposed [[Leninism]] and the [[October Revolution]].{{Efn|Certain "left" communist figures have claimed to adhere to Leninism such as [[Amadeo Bordiga]] and his supporters, although they largely omit Leninist theory and opposed its implementation in the [[Soviet Union]] under [[Joseph Stalin]].}} Because of their positions and actions, "left" communists are only [[leftist]] in words yet effectively [[rightist]] in their deeds, serving a [[Counter-revolution|counter-revolutionary]] function.<ref>Joseph Stalin (1928). [[Library:Industrialisation of the country and the Right Deviation in the C.P.S.U.(B.)|''Industrialization of the country and the Right Deviation in the C.P.S.U.(B.)'']]<br><small>''"Lenin referred to the "Left Communists" as Lefts sometimes with and sometimes without quotation marks. But everyone realizes that Lenin called them Lefts ironically, thereby emphasizing that they were Lefts only in words, in appearance, but that in reality they represented petty-bourgeois Right trends. [...] There you have a picture of the specific platform and the specific methods of the "Lefts." This, in fact, explains why the "Lefts" sometimes succeed in luring a part of the workers over to their side with the help of high-sounding "Left" phrases and by posing as the most determined opponents of the Rights, although all the world knows that they, the "Lefts," have the same social roots as the Rights, and that they not infrequently join in an agreement, a bloc, with the Rights in order to fight the Leninist line.  [...]  But if the Trotskyist trend represents a "Left" deviation, does not this mean that the "Lefts" are more to the Left than Leninism? No, it does not. Leninism is the most Left (without quotation marks) trend in the world labor movement. We Leninists belonged to the Second International down to the outbreak of the imperialist war as the extreme Left group of the Social-Democrats. We did not remain in the Second International and we advocated a split in the Second International precisely because, being the extreme Left group, we did not want to be in the same party as the petty-bourgeois traitors to Marxism, the social-pacifists and social-chauvinists."''</small></ref>


== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
Line 12: Line 11:
* [[Trotskyism]]
* [[Trotskyism]]
* [[Libertarian Marxism]]
* [[Libertarian Marxism]]
* ''[["Left-Wing" Communism: An Infantile Disorder]]''
* [[Anti-Stalinism]]
* [[Anti-Stalinism]]



Latest revision as of 15:24, 22 August 2024

Photo of Anton Pannekoek, a major "left" communist thinker.

"Left-wing" communism, or simply "left" communism, refers to a number of opportunist, dogmatic, and revisionist political tendencies which advocate extremist, uncompromising stances on topics such as vanguardism, the proletarian dictatorship, and parliamentary participation.[1] "Left" communists opposed Leninism and the October Revolution.[a] Because of their positions and actions, "left" communists are only leftist in words yet effectively rightist in their deeds, serving a counter-revolutionary function.[2]

Further reading

See also

References

  1. Paul Mattick (1938). The Masses & The Vanguard. Available on the Marxists Internet Archive.
    "The principles of independent struggle, solidarity and communism are being forced upon them in the actual class struggle. With this powerful trend toward mass consolidation and mass action the theory of regrouping and realigning the militant organizations seems to be outdated. True regroupment is essential, but it cannot be a mere merger of the existing organizations. In the new conditions a revision of fighting forms is necessary. “First clarity – then unity.” Even small groups recognizing and urging the principles of independent mass movement are far more significant than large groups that deprecate the power of the masses."
  2. Joseph Stalin (1928). Industrialization of the country and the Right Deviation in the C.P.S.U.(B.)
    "Lenin referred to the "Left Communists" as Lefts sometimes with and sometimes without quotation marks. But everyone realizes that Lenin called them Lefts ironically, thereby emphasizing that they were Lefts only in words, in appearance, but that in reality they represented petty-bourgeois Right trends. [...] There you have a picture of the specific platform and the specific methods of the "Lefts." This, in fact, explains why the "Lefts" sometimes succeed in luring a part of the workers over to their side with the help of high-sounding "Left" phrases and by posing as the most determined opponents of the Rights, although all the world knows that they, the "Lefts," have the same social roots as the Rights, and that they not infrequently join in an agreement, a bloc, with the Rights in order to fight the Leninist line.  [...]  But if the Trotskyist trend represents a "Left" deviation, does not this mean that the "Lefts" are more to the Left than Leninism? No, it does not. Leninism is the most Left (without quotation marks) trend in the world labor movement. We Leninists belonged to the Second International down to the outbreak of the imperialist war as the extreme Left group of the Social-Democrats. We did not remain in the Second International and we advocated a split in the Second International precisely because, being the extreme Left group, we did not want to be in the same party as the petty-bourgeois traitors to Marxism, the social-pacifists and social-chauvinists."

Notes

  1. Certain "left" communist figures have claimed to adhere to Leninism such as Amadeo Bordiga and his supporters, although they largely omit Leninist theory and opposed its implementation in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin.