Essay:Analysis of Hoxhaist arguments: Difference between revisions
GermanMaoist (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Hoxhaists often use arguments of Enver Hoxha's critique on Chairman Mao, in which he lied and did not fully analyse Chairman Mao completly") |
GermanMaoist (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hoxhaists often use arguments of Enver Hoxha's critique | Hoxhaists often use false arguments to prove that ''Chairman Mao was a revisionist''. Comrades of the [[Maoist Students Collective]] have analysed [[Enver Hoxha|Enver Hoxha's]] critique against Chairman Mao and the People's Republic of China during the Maoist era. | ||
==Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution?== | |||
The book ”Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution” that was written by Enver Hoxha, tries to prove how the Chinese Revolution was a ”bourgeois-democratic revolution”. Enver Hoxha compared the [[Chinese Revolution]] with the French Revolution, which does not make any common sense. | |||
===Analysing the Chinese Revolution=== | |||
The Chinese Revolution was not a Bourgeois revolution, the Chinese Revolution was led by both the [[Peasantry]] and the [[Proletariat]], those were the main classes that have participated in the Chinese Revolution. The Chinese Revolution was also supported by the [[Petty-bourgeoisie]] and elements of the [[National Bourgeoisie]]. What the Chinese Revolution was, was a New-Democratic Revolution. A New Democratic revolution completes the tasks of a bourgeois revolution and is required for communist movements to overcome bureaucrat-comprador capitalism in semi-colonial and semi-feudal countries. | |||
Revision as of 08:02, 23 November 2025
Hoxhaists often use false arguments to prove that Chairman Mao was a revisionist. Comrades of the Maoist Students Collective have analysed Enver Hoxha's critique against Chairman Mao and the People's Republic of China during the Maoist era.
Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution?
The book ”Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution” that was written by Enver Hoxha, tries to prove how the Chinese Revolution was a ”bourgeois-democratic revolution”. Enver Hoxha compared the Chinese Revolution with the French Revolution, which does not make any common sense.
Analysing the Chinese Revolution
The Chinese Revolution was not a Bourgeois revolution, the Chinese Revolution was led by both the Peasantry and the Proletariat, those were the main classes that have participated in the Chinese Revolution. The Chinese Revolution was also supported by the Petty-bourgeoisie and elements of the National Bourgeoisie. What the Chinese Revolution was, was a New-Democratic Revolution. A New Democratic revolution completes the tasks of a bourgeois revolution and is required for communist movements to overcome bureaucrat-comprador capitalism in semi-colonial and semi-feudal countries.