Left-unity: Difference between revisions

From Revolupedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(expanded)
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
<blockquote>"To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism."</blockquote>
<blockquote>"To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism."</blockquote>
This was the main reason as to why we retained this false principle for so long.
This was the main reason as to why we retained this false principle for so long.
==Organizations which practice(d) left-unity==
==Organizations which practice(d) left-unity==
* [[Democratic Socialists of America]]
* [[Democratic Socialists of America]]
Line 19: Line 20:
* [[Mass organization]]
* [[Mass organization]]
* [[United front]]
* [[United front]]
* [[Essay:Self-Criticism on the Line of "Anti-Revisionist Unity"|Self-Criticism on the Line of "Anti-Revisionist Unity"]], [[User:Saula Wenger|Saula. W]]
[[Category:Slogans]][[Category:Leftism]]
[[Category:Slogans]][[Category:Leftism]]

Revision as of 17:06, 16 December 2025

Left-unity is a slogan which calls for the unification of various left-wing political movements. Left-unity diverges in its aims, ranging from calls for limited, tactical unity between leftists in practical activities to unprincipled and opportunist stances which deny the need for splits with revisionist tendencies (e.g. between Leninism and Trotskyism, Leninism and Kautskyism, etc.).

Forms

Anti-revisionist unity

Mao Zedong (leading thinker behind Maoism) and Enver Hoxha (founder of Hoxhaism).

The Anti-Revisionist unity idea is an eclectic, revisionist idea mostly prevalent among many moderate Hoxhaists, so called "anti-revisionist" Marxist-Leninists who either fail to recognize Maoism as a universal higher stage of Marxism or in the case of some of the more Hoxha leaning of them, reject Mao's contributions all together. This position is primarily an online phenomenon as it is not reflected by any existing writer, communist party, or anything like that. It is a fully eclectic idea based on a fundamental misunderstanding of revisionism, line struggle and Anti-revisionism. It only serves to avoid line struggle and principled discussion, in favor of unprincipled unity.

A large reason for the spread of this is idea is another incorrect idea, the idea that Maoism is only applicable to the backward nations of the world, this idea was adressed by Chairman Gonzalo and the Peruvian Communist Party in the following quote from On Marxism-Leninism-Maoism:

"Furthermore, we must keep well in mind that when Comrade Stalin justly and correctly stated that we had entered the stage of Leninism as the development of Marxism, there was also opposition by those who rend their garments in a supposed defense of Marxism. There were also those who said that Leninism was only applicable to the backward countries. But, in the midst of struggle, practice has consecrated Leninism as a great development of Marxism, and thus the proletarian ideology shone victoriously in the face of the world as Marxism-Leninism.
Today, Maoism faces similar situations. All new things, like Marxism, have always advanced through struggle, and similarly, Maoism will impose itself and be acknowledged.

Another reason for this approach is that many Maoists have Hoxhaist comrades who they do not wish to offend, this is a liberal approach. Mao Zedong noted this in Combat Liberalism:

"To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism."

This was the main reason as to why we retained this false principle for so long.

Organizations which practice(d) left-unity

See also