Talk:Hoxhaism: Difference between revisions
Saula Wenger (talk | contribs) (→Is this page necessary?: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Respectfully, [[User:Saula Wenger|<span style="color:red; font-family:Garamond;">''Saula Wenger'']] [[User talk:Saula Wenger|<span style="color:red; font-family:Garamond;"><sup>''☭ Workers of''</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Saula Wenger|<span style="color:red; font-family:Garamond;"><sup>'' the world, unite!☭</sup></span>]] 22:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC) | Respectfully, [[User:Saula Wenger|<span style="color:red; font-family:Garamond;">''Saula Wenger'']] [[User talk:Saula Wenger|<span style="color:red; font-family:Garamond;"><sup>''☭ Workers of''</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Saula Wenger|<span style="color:red; font-family:Garamond;"><sup>'' the world, unite!☭</sup></span>]] 22:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
I think it needs to exist. If we consider the ICMLPO parties to be Hoxhaist (which most people would despite them opposing the label) then there are a large amount of somewhat consistent and noteworthy parties to base our definition of Hoxhaism on. Plus there is historical significance as the tendency notes the schism between the Albanian and Chinese camps during/after the Sino-Albanian split. Not to mention that even wikipedia itself believes the tendency is notable enough for its own page.[[User:Procapra]] 23:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:53, 2 October 2025
Is this page necessary?
I believe that the disambiguation page on Hoxhaism was enough. Hoxhaism in general is very much ill-defined other than what the tendency is opposed to (e.g. Maoism and Mao's China). If the only detail which can be discerned about Hoxhaists' is their support for Enver Hoxha, that does not warrant an article.
Respectfully, Saula Wenger ☭ Workers of the world, unite!☭ 22:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
I think it needs to exist. If we consider the ICMLPO parties to be Hoxhaist (which most people would despite them opposing the label) then there are a large amount of somewhat consistent and noteworthy parties to base our definition of Hoxhaism on. Plus there is historical significance as the tendency notes the schism between the Albanian and Chinese camps during/after the Sino-Albanian split. Not to mention that even wikipedia itself believes the tendency is notable enough for its own page.User:Procapra 23:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC)