Hoxhaism: Difference between revisions
Saula Wenger (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Saula Wenger (talk | contribs) (Added section.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Hoxhaists in general often do not define themselves as a separate tendency from [[anti-revisionism|anti-revisionist]] [[Marxism–Leninism]] and as such reject the term "Hoxhaism" as a self-description. It is largely the case that certain Hoxhaists such as those aligned with the [[Comintern (SH)]] use the term "Hoxhaism" or "Stalinism–Hoxhaism." | Hoxhaists in general often do not define themselves as a separate tendency from [[anti-revisionism|anti-revisionist]] [[Marxism–Leninism]] and as such reject the term "Hoxhaism" as a self-description. It is largely the case that certain Hoxhaists such as those aligned with the [[Comintern (SH)]] use the term "Hoxhaism" or "Stalinism–Hoxhaism." | ||
==Ideology== | |||
Hoxhaism defines itself as allegedly being the true continuation of Marxism–Leninism in the modern day. Hoxhaism is more defined by what it is opposed to rather than what it supports, as Hoxhaists limit their body of theory to Hoxha along with the [[Classics of Marxism|four classical theorists]] of Marxism–Leninism. | |||
Hoxhaists oppose [[Titoism]], [[Khrushchevism]], [[Brezhnevism]], and in particular [[Mao Zedong Thought]] and [[Maoism]] as [[revisionism|revisionist]] tendencies. Hoxhaists view Mao Zedong as an [[opportunism|opportunist]] and bourgeois class collaborationist who turned China away from socialist construction. They view Mao Zedong as a [[bourgeois revolution|bourgeois revolutionary]] and nothing more.<ref>Hoxha, Enver ''[https://november8ph.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/canthechineserevolutionbecalledaproletarianrevolution.pdf Can the Chinese Revolution be called a Proletarian Revolution?]'' (1979) November 8th Publishing House. pp. 1-9 </ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 23:59, 13 October 2025
Hoxhaism describes the ideology of people and organizations that sided with Albania and Enver Hoxha in the Sino-Albanian Split. The main principle character of Hoxhaism is the extremely critical analysis of Mao Zedong and Maoist China. This approach is often criticized for being dogmatic.[1]
Hoxhaists in general often do not define themselves as a separate tendency from anti-revisionist Marxism–Leninism and as such reject the term "Hoxhaism" as a self-description. It is largely the case that certain Hoxhaists such as those aligned with the Comintern (SH) use the term "Hoxhaism" or "Stalinism–Hoxhaism."
Ideology
Hoxhaism defines itself as allegedly being the true continuation of Marxism–Leninism in the modern day. Hoxhaism is more defined by what it is opposed to rather than what it supports, as Hoxhaists limit their body of theory to Hoxha along with the four classical theorists of Marxism–Leninism.
Hoxhaists oppose Titoism, Khrushchevism, Brezhnevism, and in particular Mao Zedong Thought and Maoism as revisionist tendencies. Hoxhaists view Mao Zedong as an opportunist and bourgeois class collaborationist who turned China away from socialist construction. They view Mao Zedong as a bourgeois revolutionary and nothing more.[2]
See also
- Communist Party of Germany/Marxist–Leninist
- Comintern (SH)
- Dogmato-revisionism, term used by critics of Hoxhaism
References
- ↑ https://massline.org/Dictionary/HO.htm
- ↑ Hoxha, Enver Can the Chinese Revolution be called a Proletarian Revolution? (1979) November 8th Publishing House. pp. 1-9