Essay:Analysis of Hoxhaist arguments: Difference between revisions
GermanMaoist (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
GermanMaoist (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution?== | ==Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution?== | ||
The book ”Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution” that was written by Enver Hoxha, tries to prove how the Chinese Revolution was a ”bourgeois-democratic revolution”. Enver Hoxha compared the [[Chinese Revolution]] with the French Revolution, which does not make any common sense. | The book ”Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution” that was written by Enver Hoxha, tries to prove how the Chinese Revolution was a ”bourgeois-democratic revolution”. Enver Hoxha compared the [[Chinese Revolution]] with the French Revolution, which does not make any common sense. | ||
=== | ===Analyzing the Chinese Revolution=== | ||
The Chinese Revolution was not a | The Chinese Revolution was not a bourgeois revolution. The Chinese Revolution was led by both the [[Peasantry]] and the [[Proletariat]]; those were the main classes that participated in the Chinese Revolution. The Chinese Revolution was also supported by the [[Petty-bourgeoisie]] and elements of the [[National Bourgeoisie]]. What the Chinese Revolution was, was a New-Democratic Revolution. A New-Democratic Revolution completes the tasks of a bourgeois revolution and is required for communist movements to overcome bureaucrat-comprador capitalism in semi-colonial and semi-feudal countries. | ||
===Analyzing the French Revolution=== | |||
What is different from the Chinese Revolution is that the French Revolution did not advocate for [[Class struggle]], but rather for a bourgeois takeover. The French Revolution smashed feudalism and monarchy, yet it replaced them with the rule of the bourgeoisie. After 1789, the new government was a bourgeois‑democratic government, while the new People's Government was not any Bourgeois government. | |||
Revision as of 08:12, 23 November 2025
Hoxhaists often use false arguments to prove that Chairman Mao was a revisionist. Comrades of the Maoist Students Collective have analysed Enver Hoxha's critique against Chairman Mao and the People's Republic of China during the Maoist era.
Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution?
The book ”Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution” that was written by Enver Hoxha, tries to prove how the Chinese Revolution was a ”bourgeois-democratic revolution”. Enver Hoxha compared the Chinese Revolution with the French Revolution, which does not make any common sense.
Analyzing the Chinese Revolution
The Chinese Revolution was not a bourgeois revolution. The Chinese Revolution was led by both the Peasantry and the Proletariat; those were the main classes that participated in the Chinese Revolution. The Chinese Revolution was also supported by the Petty-bourgeoisie and elements of the National Bourgeoisie. What the Chinese Revolution was, was a New-Democratic Revolution. A New-Democratic Revolution completes the tasks of a bourgeois revolution and is required for communist movements to overcome bureaucrat-comprador capitalism in semi-colonial and semi-feudal countries.
Analyzing the French Revolution
What is different from the Chinese Revolution is that the French Revolution did not advocate for Class struggle, but rather for a bourgeois takeover. The French Revolution smashed feudalism and monarchy, yet it replaced them with the rule of the bourgeoisie. After 1789, the new government was a bourgeois‑democratic government, while the new People's Government was not any Bourgeois government.