Talk:Hoxhaism

Is this page necessary?

I believe that the disambiguation page on Hoxhaism was enough. Hoxhaism in general is very much ill-defined other than what the tendency is opposed to (e.g. Maoism and Mao's China). If the only detail which can be discerned about Hoxhaists' is their support for Enver Hoxha, that does not warrant an article.

Respectfully, Saula Wenger ^{☭ Workers of the world, unite!☭} 22:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

I think it needs to exist. If we consider the ICMLPO parties to be Hoxhaist (which most people would despite them opposing the label) then there are a large amount of somewhat consistent and noteworthy parties to base our definition of Hoxhaism on. Plus there is historical significance as the tendency notes the schism between the Albanian and Chinese camps during/after the Sino-Albanian split. Not to mention that even wikipedia itself believes the tendency is notable enough for its own page.User:Procapra 23:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC)