Essay:Analysis of Hoxhaist arguments

Hoxhaists often use false arguments to prove that Chairman Mao was a revisionist. Comrades of the Maoist Students Collective have analysed Enver Hoxha's critique against Chairman Mao and the People's Republic of China during the Maoist era.

Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution?

The book ”Can the Chinese Revolution be called a proletarian revolution” that was written by Enver Hoxha, tries to prove how the Chinese Revolution was a ”bourgeois-democratic revolution”. Enver Hoxha compared the Chinese Revolution with the French Revolution, which does not make any common sense.

Analyzing the Chinese Revolution

The Chinese Revolution was not a bourgeois revolution. The Chinese Revolution was led by both the Peasantry and the Proletariat; those were the main classes that participated in the Chinese Revolution. The Chinese Revolution was also supported by the Petty-bourgeoisie and elements of the National Bourgeoisie. What the Chinese Revolution was, was a New-Democratic Revolution. A New-Democratic Revolution completes the tasks of a bourgeois revolution and is required for communist movements to overcome bureaucrat-comprador capitalism in semi-colonial and semi-feudal countries.

Analyzing the French Revolution

What is different from the Chinese Revolution is that the French Revolution did not advocate for Class struggle, but rather for a bourgeois takeover. The French Revolution smashed feudalism and monarchy, yet it replaced them with the rule of the bourgeoisie. After 1789, the new government was a bourgeois‑democratic government, while the new People's Government was not any Bourgeois government.