Anti-Maoism: Difference between revisions
Saula Wenger (talk | contribs) m (→Stances) |
Saula Wenger (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Anti-Maoists frequently engage in [[dogmato-revisionism]], anti-[[People's Republic of China|Chinese]] [[chauvinism]], and generally fallacious arguments to attack Maoism. Most "communists" who are anti-Maoists belong to [[Hoxhaism]], [[Dengism]] and other [[Revisionism|revisionist]] stances. These revisionists are threatened by Maoism due to it being the most advanced stage in [[Marxism|Marxist]] thought, giving it the capacity to expose the shortcomings in their own tendencies. | Anti-Maoists frequently engage in [[dogmato-revisionism]], anti-[[People's Republic of China|Chinese]] [[chauvinism]], and generally fallacious arguments to attack Maoism. Most "communists" who are anti-Maoists belong to [[Hoxhaism]], [[Dengism]] and other [[Revisionism|revisionist]] stances. These revisionists are threatened by Maoism due to it being the most advanced stage in [[Marxism|Marxist]] thought, giving it the capacity to expose the shortcomings in their own tendencies. | ||
Maoism | The ideological superiority of Maoism is shown through its role as the guiding ideology for many communist movements around the world (such as [[Peru]], the [[Philippines]], and [[India]]); Hoxhaism, by contrast, has very few adherents that are actively waging revolution. | ||
==Stances== | ==Stances== | ||
===Maoism being class collaborationist=== | ===Maoism being class collaborationist=== | ||
Revision as of 21:50, 18 November 2025
Anti-Maoism encompasses nominally communist movements which seek to undermine and denigrate Marxism–Leninism–Maoism, Mao Zedong Thought, and the Mao Zedong himself.
Anti-Maoists frequently engage in dogmato-revisionism, anti-Chinese chauvinism, and generally fallacious arguments to attack Maoism. Most "communists" who are anti-Maoists belong to Hoxhaism, Dengism and other revisionist stances. These revisionists are threatened by Maoism due to it being the most advanced stage in Marxist thought, giving it the capacity to expose the shortcomings in their own tendencies.
The ideological superiority of Maoism is shown through its role as the guiding ideology for many communist movements around the world (such as Peru, the Philippines, and India); Hoxhaism, by contrast, has very few adherents that are actively waging revolution.
Stances
Maoism being class collaborationist
Maoism as a nationalist deviation
Maoism being dogmatic
Maoism being metaphysical
Maoism being Third Worldist
Further reading
- Enver Hoxha Refuted (1981), by N. Sanmugathasan