Maoism–Third Worldism: Difference between revisions
m (Fixed a Grammar mistake oopsie) |
Saul Wenger (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Criticism == | == Criticism == | ||
Third Worldism has been criticized and contested by many [[Marxism|Marxists]], [[Maoism|Maoists]], [[Hoxhaism_(disambiguation)|Hoxhaists]] etc... for "''needlessly | Third Worldism has been criticized and contested by many [[Marxism|Marxists]], [[Maoism|Maoists]], [[Hoxhaism_(disambiguation)|Hoxhaists]] etc... for "''needlessly dividing members of the working class, omitting their struggles, and propagating identity opportunism.''" <ref name="Against «Third Worldism», the False Anti-Imperialism">[https://tjen-folket.no/2019/08/30/against-third-worldism-the-false-anti-imperialism/ ''Against "Third Worldism", the False Anti-Imperialism"].</ref> | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 03:14, 4 August 2025
| Part of a series on |
| Maoism |
|---|
 |
Maoism–Third Worldism is a tendency which claims that the majority of the working class in imperialist countries is "bought off" by its bourgeoisie from super-profits deprived from imperialism and therefore no longer holds revolutionary potential and are therefore Labor Aristocrats. Sub-tendencies of this theory such as "Sakaism"/"Settlerism". Believe that Settler Colonialism is a specific Mode of Production which emerges when a settler colony is established, this Mode of Production is defined by a Non-Proletarian Working class which is parasitically exploiting the oppressed nations in the country, Sakai did believe that White People could work together with oppressed nations in a revolution.[1] Although as a side note, "Sakaists" don't have to believe in Third Worldism to believe in Sakai's beliefs, and vice-versa.
Criticism
Third Worldism has been criticized and contested by many Marxists, Maoists, Hoxhaists etc... for "needlessly dividing members of the working class, omitting their struggles, and propagating identity opportunism." [2]