Maoism–Third Worldism: Difference between revisions
Saul Wenger (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(Added an image to make the page more stylish) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Settlers_Mythology_of_The_White_Proletariat_Cover.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Cover of "Settlers: The Mythology of The White Proletariat"]] | |||
{{Maoism sidebar}}{{Hatnote|Not to be confused with the revisionist political concept, [[Three Worlds Theory]].}} | {{Maoism sidebar}}{{Hatnote|Not to be confused with the revisionist political concept, [[Three Worlds Theory]].}} | ||
Revision as of 18:18, 14 August 2025

| Part of a series on |
| Maoism |
|---|
Maoism–Third Worldism is a tendency which claims that the majority of the working class in imperialist countries is "bought off" by its bourgeoisie from super-profits deprived from imperialism and therefore no longer holds revolutionary potential and are therefore Labor Aristocrats. Sub-tendencies of this theory such as "Sakaism"/"Settlerism". Believe that Settler Colonialism is a specific Mode of Production which emerges when a settler colony is established, this Mode of Production is defined by a Non-Proletarian Working class which is parasitically exploiting the oppressed nations in the country, Sakai did believe that White People could work together with oppressed nations in a revolution.[1] Although as a side note, "Sakaists" don't have to believe in Third Worldism to believe in Sakai's beliefs, and vice-versa.
Criticism
Third Worldism has been criticized and contested by many Marxists, Maoists, Hoxhaists etc... for "needlessly dividing members of the working class, omitting their struggles, and propagating identity opportunism." [2]